CO129-359 - Governor Sir Lugard - 1909 [12] — Page 330

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All

amout of

the pension

is

to which 12. Doyle

entitled in respect of

his H. H. service, and

an

to the date prom

which

you desine that

pension

world

Lain

should commence.

also

hat you

3. I request that

with furnish

a copy of

MR

with

the paper

д

particulars of

M. Doyle's pension

in ordent

Eft

"that application may be made to the L.C.

of The Treasury for tha

grant g

to himm

pension

in respect of

his

Service

in

Ireland

م

Office or Individual.

use

Mommas

1909

122 mich

Last Previous Paper.

в.

100.3.

Tel for co

cons 23 hich

100.3.

02901

[1739--A. & E. W.--90002/27- 25090--11-06.

Next subsequent Paper

isalo

HONG KONG

1 0128

DOMESTIC.

CO.

10128

Rece Reco 23 MAR 09

Retrial of acquicted fre

Mr. Rawlinson,-To ask the Under Secretary of State for the Colonies, whether his attention has been called to the fact that two men named Li Shek Pang and Hung Loi were tried before the Chief Justice of Hong Kong, in January 1909, on an indictment for murder, and were acquitted on the charge of murder but convicted of manslaughter; that such conviction was quashed by the Full Court, on the 25th February 1909, on the ground of the misreception of evidence and the prisoners were discharged; that the Attorney General of Hong Kong thereupon announced his intention in court of preferring a fresh indictment for murder against both prisoners in respect of the charge which had formed the subject of the indictment their conviction on which had been quashed, and the prisoners were rearrested on leaving the court; upon what authority the prisoners were put upon their trial again on the charge of murder under the circumstances above stated; and whether he will take steps to prevent any further proceedings being taken in the matter and to secure the immediate release of the prisoners.

hr Ziddes

(Today) Tuesday 23 March helo

for written reply

See 10043.

? Reply

23/3

"thas, sir." "My attention has hu caliza

to this case stated ģ

ain

the facts appear to h

advised that

nothing irregular in

there

the proceedings of

rake,

who Hefensible for the action.

342

the Attorney General that the conviction Emashing (on technical grounds) of the conviction has not the affect of

that Umefore

di

acquittal &

the is prisoners cannot plead

autrefois acquit: neither can "intrefor's convict'

Amy

has tiam quashed.

then plead

the cowickim

The point of

laur

1

Parl

de

Va

Page 330Page 331

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.